您的当前位置:首页正文

Resistance of Red Clover (Trifolium pratense) to the Root Parasitic Plant

2024-08-16 来源:步旅网
AnnalsofBotany100:537–544,2007

doi:10.1093/annbot/mcm148,availableonlineatwww.aob.oxfordjournals.org

ResistanceofRedClover(Trifoliumpratense)totheRootParasiticPlant

OrobancheminorisActivatedbySalicylatebutnotbyJasmonate

DAIKUSUMOTO1,YAAKOVGOLDWASSER2,XIAONANXIE1,3,KAORIYONEYAMA1,

YASUTOMOTAKEUCHI1andKOICHIYONEYAMA1,*

1WeedScienceCenter,UtsunomiyaUniversity,350Mine-machi,Utsunomiya321-8505,Japan,2R.H.SmithInstituteofPlantSciences&GeneticsinAgriculture,FacultyofAgriculture,Food&EnvironmentalSciences,TheHebrewUniversityofJerusalem,Rehovot76100,Israeland3UnitedGraduateSchoolofAgriculturalScience,TokyoUniversityofAgriculture

andTechnology,3-5-8Saiwai-cho,Fuchu-shi,Tokyo183-8509,Japan

Received:12February2007Returnedforrevision:21May2007Accepted:1June2007Publishedelectronically:27July2007

†BackgroundandAimsObligaterootholoparasitesofthegenusOrobancheattackdicotyledonouscropsandcauseseverelossesinmanypartsoftheworld.Chemicalinductionofplantdefencesystemssuchassystemicacquiredresistancewasproposedtobeanavailablestrategytocontroltherootparasite,butthedetailedmechanismsinvolvedhavenotbeenclarified.Theaimofthisstudywastoelucidatetheeffectsofsalicylicacid(SA),jasmonicacid(JA)andtheiranaloguesonresistanceofredclovertoOrobancheparasitism.

†MethodsRootsofredclovergrowninplasticchamberswereappliedwithSA,S-methylbenzo[1,2,3]thiadiazole-7-carbothioate(BTH),methyljasmonate(MeJA)andn-propyldihydrojasmonate(PDJ),andthenwereinoculatedwithO.minorseeds.Attachmentsoftheparasitewereobservedafter5weeks.

†KeyResultsSAandBTH,inducersofSA-mediateddefences,significantlyreducedthenumberofestablishedpara-sitesbymorethan75%.Bycontrast,MeJAandPDJ,inducersofJA-mediateddefences,didnotaffectparasitism.ThereductioninthenumberofestablishedparasitesbySAandBTHwasduetotheinhibitedelongationofO.minorradiclesandtheactivationofdefenceresponsesinthehostrootincludinglignificationoftheendodermis.

†ConclusionsTheseresultssuggestthatSA-inducedresistance,butnotJA-inducedresistance,iseffectiveininhibit-ingOrobancheparasitismandthattheresistanceisexpressedbythehostrootbothexternallyandinternally.

Keywords:Endodermis,haustoriuminducingsignal,inducedresistance,jasmonicacid,lignification,Orobancheminor,rootparasiticplant,salicylicacid,Trifoliumpratense(redclover).

INTRODUCTION

hempandtobacco(Gonsioretal.,2004)andO.cumana

RootparasiticplantsofthegenusOrobanchelackinsunflower(Mu

¨ller-Sto¨veretal.,2005).Foliarsprayofchlorophyllanddependontheirhostplantsfortheacqui-BTHwassitionofnutrientsandwater.Orobanchespp.infestagri-inpea(Pe

´alsoreportedtoreduceO.crenataattachments

rez-de-Luqueetal.,2004).AlthoughseveralculturallyimportantdicotyledonouscropsandcauseseverereportshavesuggestedtheeffectivenessofBTHapplicationyieldlossesoftheirproductioninmanypartsoftheworld,onthereductionofOrobancheattachments,physiologicalespeciallytheMediterraneanregion(ParkerandRiches,resistantmechanismstoOrobancheinfestationinducedby1993).Orobancheaegyptiaca,O.ramosa,O.crenata,BTHhavenotbeenclarified.

O.cumanaandO.minorareeconomicallydamagingJasmonicacid(JA)isanotherdefence-inducerpromotingspecies.Severalcontrolstrategieshavebeenproposedandresistanceagainstinsects(McCornetal.,1997)andpatho-employed,butnonehasprovedefficaciousbecauseofthegens(Thommaetal.,1998).JAinducesproductionofpro-complexinteractionbetweenhostsandparasites.

teinaseinhibitors(FarmerandRyan,1990)andbasicSalicylicacid(SA)isachemicaldefence-inducerpro-pathogenesis-relatedproteinsinplants.Althoughtheregu-motingfungal,bacterialandviraldiseaseresistanceandlatorymechanismsandgeneexpressioninducedbyJAinducesproductionofacidicpathogenesis-relatedproteinsaredifferentfromthoseinducedbySA(ReymondandandhypersensitiveresponsesinmanyplantspeciesFarmer,1998;Thommaetal.,1998),theeffectofJAon(ReymondandFarmer,1998;SudhaandRavishankar,resistancetorootparasiticplantshasnotpreviouslybeen2002).S-methylbenzo[1,2,3]thiadiazole-7-carbothioate

demonstrated.Theaimofthepresentstudywastoelucidate(BTH)isasyntheticfunctionalanalogueofSA(Go

¨rlachtheeffectsandtheinhibitorymechanism(s)ofSAandJAetal.,1996;Bokshietal.,2003)anditsapplicationtoonresistancetoOrobancheparasitism.

plantshasbeenproposedtobeanapplicablestrategytocontrolOrobancheparasitism.Forexample,soakingofMATERIALSANDMETHODS

sunflowerseedsinBTHsolutionreducedthenumberofattachmentsofO.cumana(Sauerbornetal.,2002).BTHSourceofseeds

soildrenchingreducedtheattachmentsofO.ramosain

OrobancheminorSm.seedswerecollectedfrommatureplantsthatparasitizedredclover,grownintheWatarase*Forcorrespondence.E-mailyoneyama@cc.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp

basininJapanin2004.Seedsofredclover(Trifolium

#TheAuthor2007.PublishedbyOxfordUniversityPressonbehalfoftheAnnalsofBotanyCompany.Allrightsreserved.

ForPermissions,pleaseemail:journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Downloaded from aob.oxfordjournals.org by guest on March 14, 2011538Kusumotoetal.—SA-InducedResistanceofRedClovertoOrobancheminor

pratenseL.‘Makimidori’),atypicalhostofO.minorandtheglass-fibrefilterpapersweretakenoutfromthe(ParkerandRiches,1993),werepurchasedfromSnowchambersonemonthaftercultivation.TheseedlingswereBrandSeedCo.,LtdinJapan.

handledcarefullysoasnottoseparatethemfromtheseed-bedsandtheglass-fibrefilterpapers.Theredcloverroots,Plantmaterialandgrowthconditions

theseedbedsandtheglass-fibre.filterpapersweresub-mergedinsolutionsof02mMSA,BTH,methyljasmonatePlasticchambers(14cminheightÂ10cminwidthÂ(MeJA)orn-propyldihydrojasmonate(PDJ),afunctional1.5cmindepth)witha1-cm-widerectangularholeintheanalogueofJA(Fujisawaetal.,1998),with0.1%Tweencentreofthetopwerefilledwithrockwool(NittoBoseki20for3handthenthoroughlyrinsedwithwatertoCo.Ltd,Tokyo,Japan).Aglass-fibrefilterpaper(14Âremovetheunabsorbedchemicals.Controlplantswere10cm;GC-90,ADVANTEC,Tokyo,Japan)wasplacedtreatedwithonly0.1%Tween20solutioninthesamebetweentherockwoolandthelidoftheplasticchamber,way.TheconditionedO.minorseedsweretransferredandasmallseedbedmadeofrockwoolwasputbetweenontotheglass-fibrefilterpaperssothattheywereintheplasticlidandtheglass-fibrefilterpaperneartheholecontactwiththeredcloverroots,15seedsper1cmof(Fig.1).Therockwoolandtheglass-fibrefilterpaperintheroot.Theglass-fibrefilterpaperswereuniformlymois-theplasticchamberweremoistenedwithtapwater.Seedstenedwith1mgL21GR24,asyntheticgerminationstimu-ofredcloverweresoakedinrunningtapwaterfor3dlant,toinduceseedgerminationsynchronously.Theredandthenoneseedeachwasplacedintheseedbedonthecloverseedlings,theseedbedsandtheglass-fibrefiltertop,atthecentreoftheplasticchamber.Theplasticpaperswerereturnedtotheplasticchambersandtheseed-chamberswerewrappedwithaluminiumfoilleavingthelingswereincubatedat238Cwitha16-hphotoperiodfor5toppartexposedandwereincubatedinagrowthchamberweeks.Fivereplicationswerepreparedforeachtreatment.

at238Cwitha16-hphotoperiod(photosyntheticphotonfluxdensitiesof52mmols21m22).Theredcloverseedsgerminatedwithin3dunderthesegrowthconditions.TheEstimationofO.minorpenetration

seedlingswerereplenishedwithtapwaterforthefirst5d,ThenumberofO.minorseedlingsattachingtoredcloverwithhalf-strengthTadano–Tanakamedium(Tadanoandrootsandtheirdevelopmentstageswererecorded5weeksTanaka,1980)forthenext6dandthenwithtapwaterafterinoculation.Developmentalstageswereclassifiedasuntiltheendoftheexperiments.

follows:S1,radicleattachingtohostrootsurface;S2,haus-toriumpenetratingintohostrootwithoutswellingofhostTreatmentwithchemicaldefence-inducersandroot;S3,hostrootswellingatpenetratedsite;S4,formationinoculationofO.minorseeds

oftubercle;andS5,tuberclewithroot-likestructures(Fig.2).

Orobancheminorseedsweresurface-sterilizedin70%ethanolfor2minandthenin1%sodiumhypochloritesolu-tionfor2min.SterilizedseedswereincubatedinasealedHistologicalstudy

PetridishlinedwithafilterpapermoistenedwithdistilledTheredcloverrootsitesofpenetrationbyO.minorwaterat238Cinthedarkfor7d(seedconditioning).seedlingsandtubercleswerefixedwith10%formaldehyde.TheplasticchamberspreparedasdescribedabovewereAfterdehydrationthroughagradedseriesofethanol(50,openedandtheredcloverseedlingswiththeseedbeds

75,95,100,100%;24h),sampleswereembeddedinLR

FIG.1.InducedresistanceofredcloverrootsagainstO.minorparasitismaftertreatmentwithwater(A),SA(B)orMeJA(C).Arrowsindicatetubercles

ofO.minor.

Downloaded from aob.oxfordjournals.org by guest on March 14, 2011Kusumotoetal.—SA-InducedResistanceofRedClovertoOrobancheminor539

andPDJwith1mgL21GR24.Seedgermination,lengthofradiclesandmorphologyofroottipswereobservedafterincubationfor7d.Viabilityoftheradicleswasdetectedbystainingwith0.4%trypanblue.FourPetridishespertreatmentwereprepared.

RESULTSANDDISCUSSION

InducedresistancetoO.minorinfectionbychemicaldefence-inducers

ThenumberofO.minorseedlingsthatsuccessfullyparasi-tizedredcloverrootswasreducedby86and77%bySAandBTHtreatments,respectively(Fig.1andTable1).Itwasfoundthatthisreductionwascausedbyacombinationoftwoseparateresistancemechanisms,namelytheinhib-itedelongationofO.minorradiclesandtheincreasedresist-anceofhostroots.

FIG.2.FivedevelopmentalstagesofO.minorseedlingspenetratingintoSAtreatmentsignificantlyreducedthetotalnumberredcloverroot.S1,firstattachmentofO.minorradicletohostrootsurface.ofO.minorseedlingsattachingtotheredcloverrootS2,penetrationofthehaustoriumintothehostrootwithoutswellinghostroot.Theboundarylinebetweenthehaustoriumandthehostcortexwas(Table1).Asobservedmicroscopically,germinationofbrown.S3,hostrootswellingatthepenetratingsite.S4,tubercleformationO.minorseedswasnotdifferentamongthetreatmentsofO.minor.S5,formationofroot-likestructuresfromparasitetubercle.

(morethan80%).However,directedgrowthoftheparasiteradiclestowardtheSA-treatedredcloverrootswasinhib-whiteresinsoft(Sigma,StLouis,MO,USA).Sectionsited(Fig.3).Theinhibitedradicleshadpapillatecellson(5–10mm)werecutwitharotarymicrotome(RM2125RT;theirroottipsandsomeofthemexhibitedabifurcaterootLeicaMicrosystems,Tokyo,Japan)andstainedwithtipform(Fig.3).Thesemorphologiesseemedtobesafranin-fastgreendoublestaining(Johansen,1940).Withsimilartothatofattachmentorgansinducedafterroottipsthisstainingmethod,celluloseandsomecytoplasmareofOrobanchereachahostrootundernormalconditionsstainedblueorgreen,whilelignifiedcellwalls,phenolic(JoelandLosner-Goshen,1994).Whendirecteffectsofsubstancesandnucleiappearred.Lignifiedcellwallswerethechemicaldefence-inducersonGR24-elicitedseedger-alsodetectedwithphloroglucinol-HCl(Jensen,1962).

minationandseedlinggrowthofO.minorwereexamined,neitherthegerminationratenortheradicleelongationdetermined7dafterGR24treatmentwereaffectedbyDirecteffectsofchemicaldefence-inducersongerminationthesedefence-inducers.TheroottipsweresmoothandofO.minorseedsandelongationofradicles

conical,anddidnotdeveloptoattachmentorgansinallthetreatments.NoneoftheseedlingsexhibitedpronouncedGerminationtestswereconductedaccordingtoChaereductionofcellviabilitiesasdeterminedbystainingwithetal.(2004).AfterconditioningofO.minorseeds,theytrypanblue.Theseresultsindicatethatthereductionofweretransferredtothe0.2mMsolutionsofSA,BTH,MJ

theparasiteattachmentswasnotduetothedirecteffect

TABLE1.EffectsofSA,BTH,MJandPDJonthetotalnumberofO.minorseedlingsattachingtoredcloverrootandthe

numberofO.minorseedlingsineachdevelopingstageofparasitism

NumberofO.minorseedlingsortuberclesineachdevelopingstageofparasitismperplant

TotalnumberofRootlengthofO.minorPenetrationredclover

seedlings

throughhostRoot-likewhereO.minorattachingtoredAttachmentcortexbutnoSwellingofTuberclestructureEstablishmentseedswerecloverrootpertoroot

rootswellinghostrootformationformationofparasitismTreatmentplaced(cm)plant

surface(S1)(S2)

(S3)(S4)(S5)(S3þS4þS5)Water156.3+6.2a323.8+60.7a53.6+8.7a135.6+32.4a32.90.2+27.7a11.8+3.5a134.6+38.7aSA171.8+12.5a115.6+19.8b32.8+4.8a64.4+14.0a.6+8.6ab32+1.4c11.8+3.4b3.4+1.1ab18.4+5.2bBTH165.2+9.7a177.4+40.4ab43.4+9.7a103.2+26.5a8.0+5.1bc19.8+8.0b3.0+1.0b30.8+13.5bMJ157.5+15.1a298.4+60.9ab47.4+7.8a139.4+33.2a36.8+10.1a68.0+20.9ab6.8+1.8ab111.6+30.1abPDJ

155.2+4.7a235.8+15.3ab50.6+3.1a110.0+15.5a21.8+4.3abc46.0+4.4ab7.4+1.5ab75.2+6.3abFromanatomicaldata,theparasiticintrusivecellsinS2werepreventedfrompenetratingintothehostcentralcylinderbutthehaustoriuminS3–S5penetratedintothecentralcylinderandconnectedwiththehostvascularsystem.Therefore,thesumofS3–S5representsthenumberofO.minorseedlingsestablishingparasitism.Valuesarepresentedasmean+s.e.offivereplications.MultiplemeancomparisonswereperformedusingTurkey-Kramer’sHSDtest,anddifferentlettersindicatesignificancedifferencesbetweenmeansatP,0.05.

Downloaded from aob.oxfordjournals.org by guest on March 14, 2011540Kusumotoetal.—SA-InducedResistanceofRedClovertoOrobancheminor

formationhavenotbeenidentified,unlikesimilarparasiticplantsStrigaandTriphysaria(Yoder,2001).Recently,itwasnotedthatattachmentorgandifferentiationinOrobanchewastriggeredendogenouslyintheabsenceof

ahost(Gonza

´lez-Verdejoetal.,2005).Therefore,wepresumethatSA-treatedredcloverrootinterruptedradicleelongationviachemicalinteractionsalthoughrelationshipbetweentheexudatesfromSA-treatedrootsandthediffer-entiationofattachmentorgansremainsuncertain.

Asecondbarriertoparasitismoccurredaftercorticalinvasionbytheparasitebutbeforegrossmorphologicalchangeswereobservedinthehost.AnatomicalobservationsshowedthatthepenetrationofparasiticintrusivecellsinstageS2wasstoppedatthelignifiedendodermisofthehostrootanddidnotconnectwithhostvessels(Fig.4A,C).FIG.3.AbortionofO.minorseedlingsinducedbytheredcloverrootBycontrast,parasitesinstageS3–S5penetratedintothetreatedwithSA.Someoftheseedlingsshowedabifurcateroottipform

centralcylinderoftheredcloverrootandthehaustorial(arrows).

cellsoccupiedthecentralcylinderofthehostroots(Figs5and6).InthelaterstagesofS4andS5,thehaustoriaofthechemicalsonseedgerminationandradiclegrowth.expandedinthehostroot(Fig.6A)andaxiallyorientatedNormallyOrobancheradiclesstopelongationsoonafterxylemvesselsoftheparasiteoriginappearedtogethertheroottipsreachahost,andthenformattachmentwiththehostvessels(Fig.6B,C).Verticalparasiteorgans.However,signalsinducingattachmentorgan

vesselslinkedwiththeaxialparasitevesselswereobserved

FIG.4.TransversesectionsoftheredcloverrootinstageS2.Thesectionswerestainedbysafranin-fastgreen(A,B)andbyphloroglucinol-HCl(C).(A)Sectionofwater-treatedredcloverroot.PenetrationofO.minorintrusivecells(Pic)wasstoppedattheendodermis(En).Arrowindicateslignifiedthickwallsofhostvesselsinducedbytheparasitepenetration.(B)High-magnificationphotographofthecentralcylinderofSA-treatedredcloverroot.Fibrecells(F)accumulatedsafranin-positivesubstance(arrow)andhostvessel(Hv)wasoccludedbyastainedsubstance(arrowhead).(C)Cell-walllig-nification(arrowhead)oftheendodermis(En),pericycleandfibrecells(F)ofwater-treatedredcloverroot.Lignificationoccurredatthenearsideoftheendodermisfromtheparasiticintrusivecells(Pic)butnotattheoppositeside.Scalebar¼100mm(A),50mm(B,C).En,endodermis;F,fibre;Hc,host

cortex;Hv,hostvessel;P,parasite;Pic,parasiticintrusivecell.

Downloaded from aob.oxfordjournals.org by guest on March 14, 2011Kusumotoetal.—SA-InducedResistanceofRedClovertoOrobancheminor541

FIG.5.TransversesectionsoftheredcloverrootinstageS3(A,B)andS4(C,D).Sectionswerestainedbysafranin-fastgreen(A,C,D)andbyphloroglucinol-HCl(B).(A)SectionofSA-treatedredcloverroot.Parasitehaustorium(Pha)intrudedintothehostcentralcylinderandcompressedthehostendodermalcells(En).(B)High-magnificationphotographofthecentralcylinderofthesamerootin(A).Lignifiedcells,i.e.hostvessels(arrow-head)andlignifiedfibres(arrow),remainedinthecentralcylinder.(C)SectionofBTH-treatedredcloverrootandparasitetubercle(Pt).(D)High-magnificationphotographofthehostxylemin(C).Mostofhostvesselsaccumulatedastainedsubstance(arrowhead).Scalebar¼100mm

(A,C),50mm(B,D).En,endodermis;Hc,hostcortex;Hx,hostxylem;P,parasite;Pha,parasitehaustorium,Pt,parasitetubercle.

FIG.6.LongitudinalsectionsoftheredcloverrootandO.minortubercleinstageS5stainedbysafranin-fastgreen.(A)Low-magnificationphotographofthehostrootandtheparasitetubercle(Pt).Parasitehaustorium(Pha)completelyfusedwiththehostcellsinthecentralcylinder(Hcc).(B)Linkageofthehostandparasitevessels.Parasiticvesselsintheverticaldirection(Vpv)continuouslyconnectedwiththeaxialparasiticvessels(Apv),whichwereformedalongthehostvessels(Hv).(C)Axialparasitevessels(Apv)lyingadjacenttothehostvessels(Hv).Vesselelementsoftheparasiteareshorterandwiderandhavemuchlargerpitsthanhostvesselelements.Scalebar¼500mm(A),50mm(B,C).Apv,axialparasiticvessel;Hcc,hostcentralcylinder;

Hv,hostvessel;Pha,parasitehaustorium;Pt,parasitetubercle;Vpv,verticalparasiticvessel.

Downloaded from aob.oxfordjournals.org by guest on March 14, 2011542Kusumotoetal.—SA-InducedResistanceofRedClovertoOrobancheminor

TABLE2.EffectsofSA,BTH,MJandPDJonpercentageoffourstages(S2,S3,S4andS5)inthetotalnumberofO.minorseedlingswhosehaustoriumpenetratedintored

cloverroot(S2þS3þS4þS5)

Penetrationintocentralcylinderthrough

PenetrationhostendodermisthroughhostcortexRootlikebutnorootSwellingofTuberclestructureswellinghostrootformationformation(S2)

(S3)(S4)(S5)Water50.12.1+1.33.0+6.2a4.5+0.9aSA.5+8.4a766+4.5b.9ab3.4+15c15.BTH77.0+6.6b4.7+2.1bc.3+3.2ab4.7+1.3a149+3.6b3.5+2.MJ56.0+4..0a25.7+3.1ab3.PDJ

.3ab14.4+1.9a58.5+41ab11.5+1.6ab.9+16a26.1+4.3ab39+0.7aFromanatomicaldata,theparasiticintrusivecellsinS2werepreventedfrompenetratingintothehostcentralcylinderbutthehaustoriuminS3–S5penetratedintothecentralcylinderandconnectedwiththehostvascularsystem.Valuesarepresentedasmean+s.e.offivereplications.MultiplemeancomparisonswereperformedusingTurkey-Kramer’sHSDtest,anddifferentlettersindicatesignificancedifferencesbetweenmeansatP,0.05.

inthemiddleofthetubercle(Fig.6B).TheseanatomicaldatasuggestthatO.minorseedlingsinS2failedinsucces-sivepenetrationintohostvascularsystemsduetohostresistanceandthoseinS3–S5successfullyconnectedandinfectedthehostroot.

Thepercentageofindividualparasitismstagesafterpara-siticcellsinvadedintoredcloverroot(S2,S3,S4andS5)wascalculatedtoclarifyfurthertheeffectsofthechemicaldefence-inducersoninternalresistanceoftheredcloverroot(Table2).SAandBTHinducedanincreaseintheper-centageoftheparasiticcellspenetratingthroughthecortexbutnotintothecentralcylinder(S2)anddecreasedtheper-centageofthestageswherethehaustoriasucceededinpenetratingintothecentralcylinder(S3andS4).Bycon-trast,MeJAandPDJhadlittleinfluenceontheseprocesses.TheseresultssuggestthatSAandBTHactivatedefenceresponsesintheredcloverrootandthuspreventthesuc-cessfulinvasionoftheparasite,whereasMeJAandPDJhavelittleeffectsontheresistancetotheOrobanchepenetration.

Histologicalobservations

Ahistologicalstudyoftheinfectionsitewasperformedtoclarifythemechanismbywhichthehostrootpreventedpenetrationoftheparasite.TheintrusivecellsofO.minorinstageS2penetratedthroughtheepidermisandthecortexoftheredcloverrootbutfurtherpenetrationwasstoppedattheendodermis(Fig.4A).Theboundarywallsbetweenthehaustoriaandthehostcortexwerebrowninnon-stainedsections.Insomecases,browndropletsaccu-mulatedinhostfibresclosetotheparasiticintrusivecells.Thesedropletswerestainedbysafranin(Fig.4B)andphloroglucinol-HCl(Fig.4C),suggestingthattheycon-tainedlignin-likelow-molecular-weightsubstances.Thecellwallsofthefibresthataccumulatedbrowndroplets

werelignified(Fig.4C).Thickvesselwallswereformedneartheparasiticintrusivecellsandstaineddenseredbysafraninandphloroglucinol-HCl(Fig.4A),indicatingthatthewallswerehighlylignified.Somehostvesselswereoccludedbyastainedsubstancerevealedbysafranin-fastgreen(Fig.4B).Thephloroglucinol-HClstainingrevealedlignificationofthecellwallsoftheendodermisandthepericyclethatcontactedtheparasiticintrusivecells,whenthepenetrationstoppedattheendodermis(Fig.4C).Inthemoredevelopedstages,S3–S5,theintrusivecellspene-tratedthroughthehostendodermisintothecentralcylinderandhaustoriaoccupiedtheinside(Figs5and6).Hostcellsinthecentralcylinderweredestroyedbytheparasiteexceptforhostvesselsandlignifiedfibrecells.Mostofthehostvesselseitherhadlignifiedthickwalls(Fig.5B)orwereoccludedbyastainedsubstance(Fig.5D)suchasthoseobservedinS2.Noanatomicaldifferenceselicitedbythechemicaltreatmentswereobservedaslongastheobservedsiteswereinthesamestageofparasitism.

BeforediscussingtheeffectsofSAandBTHontheresistanceoftheredcloverrootstoOrobanche,itisusefultosummarizethethreeaspectsofhostrootresistanceduringtheearlystagesofthepenetration.Corticalresistanceisthefirstresistancethatthepenetratinghaustoriaencounter.Ithasoftenbeenrepresentedasanapoplasticsecretionofbrownsubstances(Goldwasseretal.,2000;Rubialesetal.,2003).However,somereportsindicatedparasitecells(Pe

´thatthissecretionoriginatedfromthe

rez-de-Luqueetal.,2005).Inmorerecentstudies,suberization(Echevarrı

´a-Zomen˜2006)andprotein´oetal.,a-Zomen˜oetal.,2006;Pe

´cross-linking(Echevarrı

rez-de-Luqueetal.,2006a)ofthecorticalcellwallshavebeensuggestedtobeinvolvedintheresist-ance.Thehaustoriathenfaceendodermalresistanceafterpassingthroughthecortex.Agenotypeofvetchwithendodermalresistance(Goldwasseretal.,2000)exhibitedhigheraccumulationoflignininresponsetoparasiteinfectionthanasusceptiblegenotype(Goldwasseretal.,1999).AnatomicalstudiesrevealedthatlignificationwasinducedintheendodermalandpericyclecellsincontactwithPe

´theparasiticintrusivecells(Maitietal.,1984;rez-de-Luqueetal.,2005,2006b).Thelignifiedcellsarepresumedtorestrictthepenetrationoftheparasitecellsintothehostcentralcylinderasaphysicalbarrier.Iftheparasitepenetratesthroughtheendodermisbeforethelignificationisinducedoritovercomesthelignifiedbarrier,vesselocclusionplaystheroleinresistance.Afterpenetratingintothecentralcylinder,theparasiteconnectstohostvascularsystemsandformsatubercle.However,massivevesselocclusionbysecretionofsubstancescon-tainingcarbohydrates2001;Pe

´andpolyphenols(Labrousseetal.,

rez-de-Luqueetal.,2005,2006b)and/ortylosis(Maitietal.,1984)isassumedtodiminishwaterandnutri-entsupplytotheparasiteandcausetuberclenecrosis.Thesethreeresistantmechanismsdependonthegenotypeofhostplants(Labrousseetal.,2001)andsingleormultiplemechanismsprobablycontributetotheresistancetotheparasitepenetrationinaresistantgenotype.Bycontrast,nooronlyweakresistantresponsesappearedinasuscep-tiblegenotype.Inthepresentstudy,thenon-treatedred

Downloaded from aob.oxfordjournals.org by guest on March 14, 2011Kusumotoetal.—SA-InducedResistanceofRedClovertoOrobancheminor

543

cloverrootexhibitedtheendodermalresistanceinhalfofthepenetrationsites(seestageS2inTable2).SAandBTHtreatmentincreasedthepercentageofpenetrationsitesinstageS2,suggestingthatthesechemicalsenhancedendodermalresistance,presumablythroughtheactivationoflignification(Table2,Fig.4C).Ontheotherhand,noclearcorticalresistanceappearedintherootstreatedwiththesechemicals.Althoughvesselresistancewasshownaslignifiedthickwallsandocclusionbysubstances,SAandBTHtreatmentsdidnotaffectthefrequencyoflignificationofcellwallsandvesselocclusion,northegrowthornecro-sisofthetubercles.Therefore,itislikelythatthemainformofresistanceenhancedbySAandBTHisendodermalresistance.TheeffectsofSAonthesynthesisofligninarenotfullyunderstood(ReymondandFarmer,1998),butsomereportssuggestedthatSAactivatedlignificationinresponsetopathogeninfection(Mauch-ManiandSlusarenko,1996;HeandWolyn,2005).

PossiblestrategyofOrobancheparasitisminhostroots

ThepresentresultsshowedthatSA-dependentdefenceresponseseffectivelyinhibitedOrobancheparasitismonahostplantbutJA-dependentdefenceresponseshadlittleeffect.SAandJAinducedifferentdefencegeneexpressionviaindependentsignallingpathways(ReymondandFarmer,1998).RecentreportsdescribedthedefencegeneexpressionofhostplantsinfestedbyOrobanchespp.BasedonexaminationofmRNAaccumulationofdefencegenesinAradopsisthalianainfestedbyO.ramosa,expressionofseveralgenesmediatedbyaJA-dependentpathwaywereactivatedbyO.ramosainfestationwhereasgenesmediatedbyaSA-dependentpathwaywerenot(VieiraDosSantosetal.,2003a,b).Similarly,byusingtransgenictobaccocontainingapromoter:GUSfusion,PR-1a,anindicatorgeneoftheSA-dependentpathwayinduction,wasnotexpressedbyO.aegyptiacainfesta-tion(Griffittsetal.,2004).Thus,itislikelythathostplantsinduceaJA-dependentpathwayratherthanaSA-dependentpathwayinresponsetoOrobancheinfesta-tion.ActivationoftheJA-dependentpathwayinducedbyOrobancheinfestationareassumedtobeinsufficientfortheinhibitionofOrobancheparasitismbecausetheexogen-ousapplicationofJAanaloguesdidnotpromoteinhibition.Meanwhile,itmayhavebeenunnecessaryforOrobanchetoacquiretheabilitytoovercometheinducedresistancebySAduringevolutionbecauseSA-mediateddefenceisanunusualresponseinthenormalhost–parasiteinteraction.ItisassumedthattheeffectivenessofSAtreatmentoninhi-bitionoftheOrobancheparasitismiscausedbythediscor-dancebetweenSA-andOrobanche-inducibleresponses.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

ApartofthisstudywassupportedbyGrants-in-AidforScientificResearch(15830079,1820810)fromtheJapaneseSocietyforPromotionofScience(JSPS),andagrantforEminentResearchatUtsunomiyaUniversity.

LITERATURECITED

BokshiAI,MorrisSC,DeverallBJ.2003.Effectsofbenzothiadiazole

andacetylsalicylicacidonb-1,3-glucanaseactivityanddiseaseresist-anceinpotato.PlantPathology52:22–27.

ChaeSH,YoneyamaK,TakeuchiY,JoelDM.2004.Fluridoneandnor-flurazon,carotenoid-biosynthesisinhibitors,promoteseedcondition-ingandgerminationoftheholoparasiteOrobancheminor.PhysiologiaPlantarum120:328–337.

Echevarrı

´a-Zomen˜oS,Pe´rez-de-LuqueA,Jorrı´nJ,MaldonadAM.2006.Pre-haustorialresistancetobroomrape(Orobanchecumana)insunflower(Helianthusannuus):cytochemicalstudies.JournalofExperimentalBotany57:4189–4200.

FarmerEE,RyanCA.1990.Interplantcommunication:airbornemethyl

jasmonateinducessynthesisofproteinaseinhibitorsinplantleaves.ProceedingsoftheNationalAcademyofSciencesofUSA87:7713–7716.

FujisawaH,KohiyamaM,SetoH,YoshidaS,KamuroY.1998.Effects

ofjasmonicacidcompoundonfruitsetting,fruitgrowth,ripeningandcold-resistance.ActaHorticulturae463:261–266.

GoldwasserY,HershenhornJ,PlakhineD,KleifeldY,RubinB.1999.

BiochemicalfactorsinvolvedinvetchresistancetoOrobancheaegyptiaca.PhysiologicalandMolecularPlantPathology54:87–96.GoldwasserY,PlakhineD,KleifeldY,ZamskiE,RubinB.2000.The

differentialsusceptibilityofvetch(Viciaspp.)toOrobancheaegyptiaca:anatomicalstudies.AnnalsofBotany85:257–262.

GonsiorG,BuschmannH,SziniczG,SpringO,SauerbornJ.2004.

Inducedresistance–aninnovativeapproachtomanagebranchedbroomrape(Orobancheramosa)inhempandtobacco.WeedScience52:1050–1053.

Gonza

´lez-VerdejoCI,BarandiaranX,MorenoMT,CuberoJI,DiPietroA.2005.Animprovedaxenicsystemforstudyingpre-infectiondevelopmentoftheparasiticplantOrobancheramosa.AnnalsofBotany96:1121–1127.

Go

¨rlachJ,VolrathS,Knauf-BeiterG,HengyG,BeckhoveU,KogelKH,etal.1996.Benzothiadiazole,anovelclassofinducersofsystemicacquiredresistance,activatesgeneexpressionanddiseaseresistanceinwheat.ThePlantCell8:629–643.

GriffittsAA,CramerCL,WestwoodJH.2004.Hostgeneexpressionin

responsetoEgyptianbroomrape(Orobancheaegyptiaca).WeedScience52:697–703.

HeCY,WolynDJ.2005.Potentialroleforsalicylicacidininducedresist-anceofasparagusrootstoFusariumoxysporumf.sp.asparagi.PlantPathology54:227–232.

JensenWA.1962.Botanicalhistochemistry.SanFrancisco:W.H.Freedom.JoelDM,Losner-GoshenD.1994.Theattachmentorganoftheparasitic

angiospermsOrobanchecumanaandO.aegyptiacaanditsdevelop-ment.CanadianJournalofBotany72:564–574.

JohansenDA.1940.Plantmicrotechnique.NewYork:McGraw-Hill.

LabrousseP,ArnaudMC,SerieysH,Berville

´A,ThalouarnP.2001.SeveralmechanismsareinvolvedinresistanceofHelianthustoOrobanchecumanaWallr.AnnalsofBotany88:859–868.

MaitiRK,RamaiahKV,BisenSS,ChidleyVL.1984.Acomparative

studyofthehaustorialdevelopmentofStrigaasiatica(L.)Kuntzeonsorghumcultivars.AnnalsofBotany54:447–457.

Mauch-ManiB,SlusarenkoAJ.1996.Productionofsalicylicacidpre-cursorsisamajorfunctionofphenylalanineammonia-lyaseintheresistanceofArabidopsistoPeronosporaparasitica.ThePlantCell8:203–212.

McCornM,CreelmanRA,BellE,MulletJE,BrowseJ.1997.

JasmonateisessentialforinsectdefenceinArabidopsis.ProceedingsoftheNationalAcademyofSciencesofUSA94:5473–5477.

Mu

¨ller-Sto¨verD,BuschmannH,SauerbornJ.2005.IncreasingcontrolreliabilityofOrobanchecumanathroughintegrationofabiocontrolagentwitharesistance-inducingchemical.EuropeanJournalofPlantPathology111:193–202.

ParkerC,RichesCR.1993.Parasiticweedsoftheworld:biologyand

control.Wallingford,UK:CABInternational.Pe

´rez-de-LuqueA,Jorrı´nJV,RubialesD.2004.Crenatebroomrapecontrolinpeabyfoliarapplicationofbenzothiadiazole(BTH).Phytoparasitica32:21–29.

Downloaded from aob.oxfordjournals.org by guest on March 14, 2011544Kusumotoetal.—SA-InducedResistanceofRedClovertoOrobancheminor

Pe

´rez-de-LuqueA,RubialesD,CuberoI,PressMC,ScholesJ,YoneyamaK,etal.2005..InteractionbetweenOrobanchecrenataanditshostlegumes:unsuccessfulhaustorialpenetrationandnecrosisofthedevelopingparasite.AnnalsofBotany95:935–942.Pe

´rez-de-LuqueA,Gonza´lez-VerdejoCI,LozanoMD,DitaMA,CuberoJI,Gonza

´lez-MelendiP,etal..2006a.Proteincross-linking,peroxidaseandb-1,3-endoglucanaseinvolvedinresistanceofpeaagainstOrobanchecrenata.JournalofExperimentalBotany57:1460–1469.

Pe

´rez-de-LuqueA,LozanoMD,CuberoJI,Gonza´lez-MelendiP,Risuen

˜oMC,RubialesD.2006b.MucilageproductionduringtheincompatibleinteractionbetweenOrobanchecrenataandViciasativa.JournalofExperimentalBotany57:931–942.

ReymondP,FarmerEE.1998.Jasmonateandsalicylateasglobalsignals

fordefencegeneexpression.CurrentOpinioninPlantBiology1:404–411.

RubialesD,Pe

´rez-de-LuqueA,JoelDM,Alca´ntaraC,SilleroJC.2003.Characterizationofresistanceinchickpeatocrenatebroomrape(Orobanchecrenata).WeedScience51:702–707.

SauerbornJ,BuschmannH,GhiasvandGhiasiK,KogelKH.2002.

Benzothiadiazoleactivatesresistanceinsunflower(Helianthusannuus)totheroot-parasiticweedOrobanchecumana.Phytopathology92:59–64.

SudhaG,RavishankarGA.2002.Involvementandinteractionofvarious

signalingcompoundsontheplantmetaboliceventsduringdefenceresponse,resistancetostressfactors,formationofsecondarymetab-olitesandtheirmolecularaspects.PlantCell,TissueandOrganCulture71:181–212.

TadanoT,TanakaA.1980.Responsetolowphosphateconcentrationin

culturesolutionduringearlygrowthstages.JapaneseJournalofSoilScienceandPlantNutrition51:399–404(inJapanese).

ThommaBPH,EggermontK,PenninckxIAMA,Mauch-ManiB,

VogelsangR,CammueBPA,BroekaertWF.1998.Separatejasmonate-dependentandsalicylate-dependentdefence-responsepathwaysinArabidopsisareessentialforresistancetodistinctmicrobialpathogens.ProceedingsoftheNationalAcademyofSciencesofUSA95:15107–15111.

VieiraDosSantosC,DelavaultP,LetouseyP,ThalouarnP.2003a.

IdentificationbysuppressionsubtractivehybridizationandexpressionanalysisofArabidopsisthalianaputativedefencegenesduringOrobancheramosainfection.PhysiologicalandMolecularPlantPathology62:297–303.

VieiraDosSantosC,LetouseyP,DelavaultP,ThalouarnP.2003b.

DefencegeneexpressionanalysisofArabidopsisthalianaparasitizedbyOrobancheramosa.Phytopathology93:451–457.

YoderJI.2001.Host-plantrecognitionbyparasiticScrophulariaceae.

CurrentOpinioninPlantBiology4:359–365.

Downloaded from aob.oxfordjournals.org by guest on March 14, 2011

因篇幅问题不能全部显示,请点此查看更多更全内容